Web3 & DAOs
Introduction
Separating Hype from Substance:
“The good news is, the underlying protocols can be used for so much more. It is not an exaggeration to say that they can revolutionize some of the biggest industries in the world.”
https://medium.com/swlh/what-web3-is-and-what-web3-is-not-my-trip-down-the-rabbit-hole-78bf84f4f546
Looking beyond NFTs and Bitcoin
Beyond media attention and rampant fraud, what is the substance of blockchain technology? Looking at Web3
Who is building Web3?
“If we take a look at the web 3.0 ecosystem and the different people building it we get a funky mix between blockchain evangelists and activists. There are old school crypto anarchists, as well as investors, bankers, libertarians, founders, artists, NGOs and activists”
https://medium.com/hackernoon/how-the-utopian-vision-of-web-3-0-clashes-with-reality-60a8dfb2fb3b
IMPORTANT
Understanding how different dynamics drive the development of web3 (big tech, VC capital, speculation and idealism), how diverse the motivations of the developers are and how the visions of web3 are often conflicting.
This important to contextualize the work of Lorenzo and Akasha team, since they are actively fighting for the community not to repeat the same mistakes with Web3 as with Web2.
Below some examples of Web3 critique to set context:
Can Web3 change the system without changing the existing economic system? Opinions:
In fact, when the whole logic of the economy revolves around the needs of capital, it's those very needs that exercise the gravitational pull that turns these numerous seemingly emancipatory decentralized platforms into invisible enforces of the hyper-capitalist project. 3/5
— Evgeny Morozov (@evgenymorozov) January 24, 2022
On existing implementations. Can Web3 actually distribute trust? Opinions:
We should accept the premise that people will not run their own servers by designing systems that can distribute trust without having to distribute infrastructure. This means architecture that anticipates and accepts the inevitable outcome of relatively centralized client/server relationships, but uses cryptography (rather than infrastructure) to distribute trust. One of the surprising things to me about web3, despite being built on “crypto,” is how little cryptography seems to be involved! […] We should try to reduce the burden of building software. At this point, software projects require an enormous amount of human effort. […] I think changing our relationship to technology will probably require making software easier to create, but in my lifetime I’ve seen the opposite come to pass. Moxie Marlinspike, Signal founder
https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html
Collaboration: Historical and social context
Dunbar Scale Social Circles
“If you live in a hunter-gatherer band, you probably won’t hit this limit. Your social circle is a few dozen people, so you can easily keep track of who’s kind, who’s generous, who cheats, who steals, who shares their food. A repeated game. Webs of trust form organically. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. These reputations get shared through gossip, and the result is a high-trust context, where people can cooperate without really thinking about it.
Beyond 150, you start to run into problems. You can’t keep track of all the players, so free-riders get away with it. Sociopathic behaviors become personally advantageous. This isn’t just true for hunter-gatherers. We see it in contemporary communities, too.”
https://subconscious.substack.com/p/dunbar-scale-social?s=r
We have evolved our social systems to enable collaboration beyond our small-scale tribes. But it has been a messy process and it came at the price of centralizing power. (Notes from Chris M.)
Explicit and implicit contracts in society
“Though the sovereign’s edicts may well be arbitrary and tyrannical, Hobbes saw absolute government as the only alternative to the terrifying anarchy of a state of nature.”"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract
Centralized power was historically needed as a way to ensure collaboration beyond the Dunbar-scale. Vertical hierarchies were necessary to ensure mutual trust. This included banks, judges and police, backed by governments, currencies and, ultimately, military power. Through this, a contract with a stranger could be enforced or persecuted if breached. Supported by a shared framework of narratives around nations, culture, religion and law, this enabled collaboration to scale to the size of empires.
Can decentralized enable anonymous collaboration at scale without a central authority?
Photo by Phoenix Han on Unsplash